Skip to main content

Platform Comparison

How does Unit Network compare to other blockchain platforms for tokenization?


Overview

FeatureUnit NetworkEthereumSolanaPolkadot
PurposeTokenization platformGeneral-purpose smart contractsHigh-throughput smart contractsInteroperability protocol
Token creationNo-code UIRequires Solidity smart contractRequires Rust/AnchorRequires parachain or smart contract
Built-in DEX✅ Native❌ (Uniswap, etc.)❌ (Raydium, etc.)❌ (HydraDX, etc.)
Built-in treasury✅ Every token has one❌ Must build custom❌ Must build custom❌ Must build custom
Transaction fees2% trade fee, free transfersGas fees ($1-100+)Gas fees ($0.001)Gas fees (variable)
ConsensusSubstrate PoA/NPoSProof of StakeProof of History + PoSNominated Proof of Stake
Smart contractsNo (pallet-based)Yes (EVM)Yes (SVM)Yes (various)
FrameworkSubstrateCustomCustomSubstrate

Key Differentiators

🏦 Treasury-Backed Tokens

Unit Network's killer feature: every token has a built-in treasury that grows with every trade.

🎯 No-Code Token Creation

PlatformTo create a token you need...
Unit NetworkClick buttons in the app UI
EthereumWrite & deploy an ERC-20 Solidity contract
SolanaUse SPL Token CLI or write Anchor program
PolkadotDeploy on a parachain with smart contracts

💰 Fee Model Comparison

PlatformWhere do fees go?
Unit Network50% to treasuries, 25% to LPs, 25% to vault operators
Uniswap (Ethereum)100% to liquidity providers
Raydium (Solana)Split between LPs and protocol
HydraDX (Polkadot)Split between LPs and treasury

When to Choose Unit Network

Choose Unit Network if you want:

  • No-code token creation with built-in treasury
  • Automatic value accrual through trading fees
  • Transparent, predictable fee structure
  • An all-in-one tokenization platform

Choose another platform if you need:

  • Complex smart contract logic (DeFi protocols, NFTs, gaming)
  • EVM/Solidity compatibility
  • Sub-cent transaction fees for high-frequency trading
  • Maximum decentralization and censorship resistance